Skip to content

3.0 Study Guide and Task Sheet: Data Analysis and Visualization

Minimum loop for the data analysis study guide

The main study route is now in Chapter 3 entry. Use this page only as a quick checklist while you practice.

readinspectcleansummarizevisualizeexplain

If you cannot explain a chart in one sentence, return to the data question.

CheckEvidence
I can inspect rows, columns, types, and missing valuesdf.info() and missing-value notes
I can clean duplicates, missing values, and obvious outlierscleaning log
I can use groupby to answer a questionsummary table
I can choose a chart for a specific question3 chart files
I can state a conclusion and a limitationreport.md
I can finish the reproducible workshopch03_output/
Check reasoning and explanation
  • Use the checklist as a final evidence audit. You should be able to point to a raw file, a cleaned file or cleaning script, a summary table, a chart, and a short conclusion for each project.
  • For every conclusion, write one sentence of support and one sentence of limitation. This habit prevents overclaiming from small or messy data.
  • If another learner cannot rerun your notebook or script from a fresh folder, fix paths, dependencies, and README steps before moving on.
ArtifactIt should answer
Data dictionaryWhat does each column mean, what unit does it use, and where did it come from?
Cleaning logWhich rows or values changed, and why was that rule acceptable?
Summary tableWhat numeric pattern supports the answer?
ChartWhat single question does the visual answer?
Limitation noteWhat could still be wrong because of missing data, sampling, time, or leakage?

Continue to Chapter 4 when one CSV can travel from raw data to cleaned data, summary table, chart, and short written conclusion.

Keep this page’s proof of learning as a small evidence card:

Data Source
raw records or small dataset used
Processing Step
pure Python, NumPy, Pandas, charting, or SQL operation
Output
cleaned data, statistic, chart, query result, or report note
Failure Check
missing data, shape mismatch, wrong aggregation, or unclear question
Expected Output
data artifact plus the evidence needed to trust it