Skip to content

7.2.1 LLM Overview Roadmap: Capability, Cost, Product Fit

LLM overview is not a model-name list. It helps you decide what a large model can do, what it costs, and when prompting, RAG, Agent, or fine-tuning is a better route.

LLM overview chapter relationship diagram

Large model capability stack and application ecosystem diagram

RouteUse when
promptthe model already knows enough and task is simple
RAGprivate or changing knowledge must be cited
Agentthe model must use tools or take steps
fine-tuningbehavior/style/format needs repeated adaptation
request = {
"needs_private_docs": True,
"needs_tool_action": False,
"needs_repeated_style": False,
}
if request["needs_tool_action"]:
route = "Agent"
elif request["needs_private_docs"]:
route = "RAG"
elif request["needs_repeated_style"]:
route = "fine-tuning"
else:
route = "prompt"
print("recommended_route:", route)

Expected output:

Terminal window
recommended_route: RAG

LLM route decision run result map

This is not a full architecture decision. It is the habit: choose the smallest route that solves the actual product need.

OrderReadWhat to keep
17.2.2 Development Historywhy scaling and instruction tuning mattered
27.2.3 Core Conceptscontext, tokens, temperature, latency, cost
37.2.4 Industry Landscapemodel/provider selection notes
47.2.5 LLM Call Workbenchone request/response record

Keep this page’s proof of learning as a small evidence card:

Capability Stack
tokens, context, pretraining, instruction, alignment
Cost Check
context length and output length affect cost/latency
Product Fit
choose model behavior by task need, not hype
Evaluation Loop
fixed cases, score, failure note
Next Action
connect overview to prompt testing in 7.5

You pass this roadmap when you can explain one model choice in terms of capability, context, cost, latency, data privacy, and route fit.

Check reasoning and explanation
  1. A passing answer explains how tokens, context, attention, prompts, and generation behavior connect in one request-response path.
  2. The evidence should include at least one reproducible prompt or structured-output test, plus notes on why the output passed or failed.
  3. A good self-check separates prompt design, RAG, fine-tuning, and alignment: use the lightest method that fixes the observed problem.